Governance & Code of Conduct
This topic contains 37 replies, has 7 voices, and was last updated by Anonymous 11 months ago.
Follow up of the topic of nurturing a friendly online community and handling inappropriate ways of communicating of certain community members, here is a link to the code of conduct in place in the Funkwhale community : https://funkwhale.audio/en_US/code-of-conduct
This code of conduct was co-build with the members of the community, and maybe Loomio as a tool is also useful for that (see the example here https://governance.funkwhale.audio/g/kQgxNq15/funkwhale) In this process they conducted an “anti-abuse audit” https://governance.funkwhale.audio/d/pQS1Uznd/abuse-audit which might be useful as inspiration.
More at large in open source projects, the https://www.contributor-covenant.org/ is a good base plate if you don’t have a code of conduct.
Another tool I know for this kind of issue is the “move commons” label which is similar to creative commons in some ways http://movecommons.org/np-rp-rc.di-gr/0.1/en/ (the site doesn’t seem to be updated since 2012, so there might be a good replacement for this).
Hope this collective and this initiatives finds the right tools and methods for its community ! Good luck and my thoughts go out to people who feel abused in this community. ❤️️
ps. sorry, I haven’t looked deeper into the discussions with the members with whom you are having difficulties.
Quite a lot of ink dripping down for one single person.
Well it was public for me, because I have been following PP this way (anonymously) for a couple of years now 😉
And with me quite a few others.
That’s one of the reasons I now actively try to make all the information more accessible, because i also get your point, there was quite some ‘privacy through obscurity’. There are some topics I can’t even find today 🙂
However: always plan for success!
It may have been so in the past, but when V4 launches and we all get our act together, ‘privacy through obscurity’ will be obliterated!
Especially once we get the indexes running.
Well whether the forum should be regarded as public or private could be defined in the “Governance & Code of Conduct”.
This goes beyond privacy maters, because it also affects the fundaments of the forum.
I for one treat the forum as public, and always try to add as much information (mostly links) so random visitors (through e.g. search engines) can also follow what’s going on and be helped on their way.
Private messages I send through Personal Messages.
Direct involvement in projects mostly goes through Slack (or private email, meetings).
All I am missing are ‘comments’ in which you can react to a specific reply, without disturbing the flow of the Topic, as these comments can sometimes become quite distractive.
And also these comments could be private(!), for members only, just as on most Forums…
Replies would always be ‘public’, while comments are community.
Also solving the YouTube problem.
These are part of the public side of the forum, just like the replies!
i would agree with @frogfall here. forums are public and thats the cool thing about it, everyone can read and interact here. Slack,discord, whatsapp those are tools people use for “backstage” PP. Community members around the world already use those for their own local communities, maybe we should have one for the entire community? However I do also like the openness, accessibility and transparency of forums
The forums are all public.
They can be read by anybody – nobody needs an account.
There is no privacy in a public forum – nor should there be.
Interesting, I don’t remember someone from Namibia posting George Carlin videos.
I try to keep things simple for myself:
Stay on topic
Use language as if you were talking to the policeman that stopped you for a traffic violation.
Humor is good but understand what happens if not everyone gets it.
When in doubt include a cat video.
Unfortunately, some “codes of conduct” have destroyed forums.
Bizarrely, they seem to end up being used as a weapon, by someone with anger issues, to attack bemused users (and even to attack the forum hosts or moderators) following even the slightest disagreement.
The wording has to be incredibly carefully written to prevent creating semantic ammunition for unreasonable people.
My suggestion in the other thread that “what happens in the forum stay in the forum” was not meant to imply that the forum is not public. A full forum thread or related threads provide the context for the comments in the discussion. When someone selects a portion to broadcast in a new venue to a different audience, that context is invariably lost and usually confusion or worse is created.
I think Discord might be a good choice.
Slack has it’s limitations (especially when going global), Liferay, well seems to overcomplicate stuff.
I too like openness, but I’ve also organised plenty of events (to stay with the backstage analogy) and the public should have the choice ‘how deep the rabithole goes’.
As long as the discord is also open to everyone (and the discord also shares back to the forum), people have the choice what level of information or involvement they get.
Come for the info? Enjoy!
Want to become involved in the community? Become a forum member (and have access to comments).
Want to help develope? Join the discord.
Kind of an ‘if you don’t WANT the heat, stay out of the kitchen’ scenario…
right, should we come to an outcome ?
1. ‘code of conduct’ as proposed by the OP ?
2. definition of ‘privacy’ and ‘public’ may rely on proportions and thus requires consensus in case of doubt ?
3. anything i missed ?
i think it’s rather your terrain to build consensus of what has been figured til here
@davehakkens, yes; there seems to be a need for a local based community with up/down stream possibilities into a global and ‘public’ space. ‘Liferay’ and I think the french guy’s platform did work out exactly this. i don’t know discord at all but if it’s really open-source and we can build apps and bots in top, then there you go 🙂
thanks, makes sense and this all is fine with me; I just wanted to point out, there is a clear boundary between the forum and the ‘public’, I’d also like to point out that those ‘invisible’ lines shouldn’t be really crossed when it comes down ‘don’t do this others when you won’t do it to yourself’, I hope that makes sense; of you course you can apply strict usage of definitions but as we know, it can easily hurt somebody abusing them when it is not needed 😉 For my part however, I never perceived the forum as the ‘public’ channel of PP; there was little to no evidence ever for me;
sure, that’s all ok but please really don’t forget the actually reality when it comes down to the numbers. youtube != forum. there are worlds in between and cherry picking stuff from here and put it on a large screen is a sort of privacy violation , especially when there was no consensus and we actually love each other so much 😉
sorry, i just stick to what the reality is.
@frogfall, sure, but here is a little but important detail, given the context of PP, there is only handful people here and 1% of our users went to the forum; which is also backed up by seeing 99% of all PP activists (instagram, facebook, non-english audience). Looking down at 100K + PP users worldwide and a handful of enthusiast here, i think there is huge difference, allowing me to say, this place here is the backstage of PP.
hey, great pick up; i didn’t read all but I think it’s easier to address rights first before getting lost in opinionated set of rules which favor personal preference but not basic rights fought out over centuries; I side by with Julian Assange and James Madison : you have 2 choices : ignore or argue/ask (and it’s hopefully given)
and secondly as seen in the last clash, privacy first; the forum is a pretty hidden place; for a pretty narrow minority; I think we can agree on @s2019 and others also said: whats in the forum, stays in the forum unless agreed otherwise; just like under friends.
you’re right, fully forgot this brand/ego thing of nowadays :
– make sure, your identity, crimes, unrelated works are fully exposed, with lots of points and likes of course, so everyone can see you’re the man and evtl. starts listening …
– photos of cats in the shredder, ups, I mean cats on the shredder
– talking like to the police, ack ! deal, i just never spoke to them; i have to call someone up
– stay always on the subject, no matter the dependencies/ resources involved
do we have a forum section beer’o clock yet ? no ? well, here you go 😉
anyways, i hear’ya! thx
so that’s the summary for me :
– no more links or jokes related George Carlin, Jim Jefferies, or even slightest science work on regarding the Gervais principles meets PP
– say only good things, and only good things; basically that would amount 1% of freedom of what i’ve seen on within the youtube and other networks comments, anyway, seems to be like that ‘Spain is different’ thing
– take everything serious, very serious, super serious, well, and not so serious
– trust only values provided and shared by anyone here but do not trust anyone outside
– don’t question PP, at all, just don’t, if you I do, I could hurt all the others so badly that they are depressed and never come back
– be nice, super nice, so nice that everything ends with an <3
seems reasonable, I should pull a new programming language, ‘PP script’
<3, have sweet dreams
right; a little sad but ok, i obey. at the end of the day, I really want everybody happy about what we’re doing here to our-self, to others, and to the environment. often i recon often it’s little more about ‘the goal justifies the means’, kinda ‘we do it just because we can’ sort of thing; anyways, problem solved.
While I struggle to find active (local) members, funding, (also) translating, collection, research, information etc.
For this the forum is also not the place, but it could be a great starting point for finding your way (or at least it should be).
The point a lot of problems are also offline (“for those at my door step”) is not lost on me.
In acting locally maybe even more so than in machine building.
I e.g. really need local platforms. No problem to start one, but I would like to keep them connected to the larger PP/OA-community.
This is also why the ‘context’ of the platforms is important to me. Scaleability!
There isn’t a pyramid yet, but there should be.
Your move. The Topic came down to a “guideline” (see above) and the need for dedicated ‘backstage’ platforms.
These platforms I’m still researching for your dedicated topic Tools for realtime communication
right, fine with me 🙂 i just placed my humble opinion here, also in hope i get corrected. btw. machines are not the only concern I see myself often struggeling with; unfortunately, it seems i have to re-invent PP from scratch to make this work for those at my door step. that is about manuals, translations, product / kit design, FAQs, mission, numbers, how-tos, limits and all what comes with it.
First: I prefer to use PPHQ (headquarters) instead of PP Eindhoven, as these are not necessarily the same (being from Eindhoven myself).
Second: Most of what you describe only concerns ‘the bazar’.
I refer to the mission statement of Precious Plastic:
Precious Plastic is a global community of hundreds of people working towards a solution to plastic pollution. Knowledge, tools and techniques are shared online, for free. So everyone can start (yes, you too!).
The tools are only part of the mission…
I understand the (precious plastic) machines are the most important part to you (and the V4 team), but they aren’t the most important part to the community and forum. If they became the focus of the forum, 90% of people would leave again to go look elsewhere.
This is also why PPHQ is sitting in the backseat (or rather: under the hood) of the Forum and why most of the machine builders are not here.
It may not have started out this way, but that’s the current reality.
Again not saying the machines and their issues are not important, just that these are only part of the platform, not the enitre platform by itself.
Most of the ‘machine’ forum is backstage or on private/local platforms, if online at all.
By keeping the Forum about disseminating information (in general) and setting up a public (anyone can join) backstage (like a discord) for machine builders* (including V4) the car can start to run smoothly again.
*and a discord for local activities, and a discord for research and…
Now EVERYBODY is being drowned out.
Not just the machine builders are not here, most of the local communities also are not(!). Why? in part because of endless discords like this.
This conversation belongs on a yet non existing dedicated administrative platform.
Just like the machine discussions belong on a machine builders platform.
Just like the research topics belong in dedicated research platform.
All linked by public topics (presentations) on a community platform, where questions can be asked and answered (dissemination of knowledge), but discussion are moved to ‘free to join’ dedicated channels.
I stick to my original proposal for a guideline: Davehakkens.nl is
“An All Ages, information sharing public forum, regarding Precious Plastic and it’s Open Source Ecology, on which the readers are asked to keep an open mind and assume positive intent”
and would like to continue researching the options for the backstages.
I’m not ignoring your concerns, far from it, but in this forum they mainly fall on deaf ears, hence also your frustration with not being heard. And I know you are not alone in this, as this is not just about you.
Creating a potent backstage platform, with all interested parties involved would get your (and everybody elses) concerns heard.
quick sum up,
so we have these parties involved :
1. PP Eindhoven, as owner of the car but sitting rather on the back seat but yet, with the feet on the brake pedal.
2. DIYers with not much complaints of course
3. Machine builders but obviously never really here but belong on the front seat of that very car, just as described in ‘You slowing us down‘
4. neutral supervision to make sure customer/user protection is being respected in every aspect, that’s us, unfortunately; i never wanted to do this, really but the dimension we’re looking at it requires a body which minimizes damages and gets hot-fixes though the system ASAP. btw, I am not the only one who has lots of frustration and disappointment for the PP project, I am just the one who speaks it out as is, and I am very sorry not to be fan of soft-languages in such matters 😉
5. normal (often fully under skilled, with good intend ) end-user/customers who want to make a change by using the machines in questions (i don’t see much traffic other than about using, buying and building the machines)
I understand PP also as platform, also a great experiment to test a virtual project kamp; the economics and interest driven audiences will be also there, …
now to the problem, obviously; we actually don’t need a code of conduct; i think it’s waste of time, but eventually we could look at how can get all parties being able to steer the car 🙂 and i hope, not just by abusing democracy, ownership or similar
i am so happy to see @sonik being back at the table 😉
yeah yeah, Precious Platics is too limiting for the complete Dave Hakkens Forum, but all other activities are part of the PP OSEcology, so are still covered 😉
I did not use One Army (which would have been better) as it has not yet been as clearly defined as PP..
I’m my own worse critic!
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.